Posts Tagged 'marriage'

Cultural Erosion and the *Legality* of Marriage

In a report issued yesterday by the New York Times, several *prominent* Republicans signed a legal brief in support of gay marriage. This includes four former Governors, two members of Congress, and several advisers to former President George W. Bush.

This move continues to shed light upon the fact that those on The Hill are completely out of touch with the American people. While the gay community has been manipulated by mainstream media in to a big hurrah as a victory for gay rights, they are ignoring the fact that this only further enslaves them. They are now caught in the snare that the heterosexual community has been subject to: a government mandate on the institution of marriage.

Last time I checked, marriage was not an illegal act, but a biblical concept. Lets take a look. From freedictionary:

li·cense
(lsns)

n.

1. a. Official or legal permission to do or own a specified thing. See Synonyms at permission.

b. A document, plate, or tag that is issued as proof of official or legal permission: a driver’s license.
2. Deviation from normal rules, practices, or methods in order to achieve a certain end or effect.
3. Latitude of action, especially in behavior or speech. See Synonyms at freedom.

4. a. Lack of due restraint; excessive freedom: “When liberty becomes license, dictatorship is near” (Will Durant).

b. Heedlessness for the precepts of proper behavior; licentiousness.

tr.v.li·censed, li·cens·ing, li·cens·es

1. To give or yield permission to or for.
2. To grant a license to or for; authorize. See Synonyms at authorize.
Permission. Since when does one need permission to do something which is protected by their religious freedom? Freedom. Freedom of what? The freedom to make your own choice…or is it the government’s job to issue approval? Authorize. Since when does the government hold authority over a biblical concept?
Let’s take a look at Merriam-Webster:
li·cense

noun \ˈlī-sən(t)s\

1 a: permission to act  b: freedom of action

2 a: a permission granted by competent authority to engage in a business or occupation or in an activity otherwise unlawful
b: a document, plate, or tag evidencing a license granted
c: a grant by the holder of a copyright or patent to another of any of the rights embodied in the copyright or patent short of an assignment of all rights
3 a: freedom that allows or is used with irresponsibility
b: disregard for standards of personal conduct :licentiousness
4 deviation from fact, form, or rule by an artist or writer for the sake of the effect gained
What? “An activity otherwise unlawful”? Yes, the power the government has impressed upon the church has deemed it illegal for anyone to marry, gay or straight, within a church without permission from the State to do what is otherwise unlawful, irresponsible, with  disregard for standards of personal conduct, and is a deviation from normal rules, practices, or methods. And there you have it, the act of marriage has now become subject to criminal activity unless a government official decides that it in your best interest to grant your request. Sounds like freedom, eh?
In 1999, while planning my wedding, we were specifically told by the priest that it was illegal for the church to perform the ceremonial rite of marriage. When pressed, he further responded that no church would perform such as it would jeopardize the church’s tax-exempt status. So, it seems their hands were tied as well.
This is where the government first really screwed the homosexual community, knowing at the time that churches would not perform weddings to those of the same-sex as it violated their belief system, bound churches pretty much by extortion. With the signing of this brief, it now looks as though the gay community is now bound too.
A little food for thought from my dear friend Scott Boston:

I don’t think the Government should tell Churches who to marry.

I also don’t think the Government should tell Churches who they shouldn’t marry.
If a church says that gay marriage is in violation with its beliefs and tenets of its faith then I have no problem with that church not performing that rite.
If a gay couple can find a church that wants to marry them, more power to them.
If you go to the justice of the peace, I think you should get a civil union no matter who you are since it is a civil and not a religious institution.
The reason that Government got involved in marriage was because progressives who believed in eugenics wanted to make sure that blacks and whites could not intermarry and dilute the white race.
Bingo.
Instead, both sides in Washington are now perpetuating more big-government by placing further restrictions on citizens. This is not a win for gay marriage, it is a further push toward slavery. We now have one more notch on the post of government control.
As the GOP continues to erode, so will society and American culture. From stixblog:
The slow decay of morality is the basis of the socialist movement.  It makes the people look to the State instead of Community and Religion for direction.
I do not wear my religion on my sleeve, but the total disregard for Religious Liberty is eroding, and is going into overtime with Obama.
It was mentioned to me that in a lot of ways, violent revolution would be easier than the battle that we and our children are about to face in the next generation.
I just finished The Harbinger at book club. It’s a very interesting read about an ancient biblical prophecy that foretells our collapse.
This isn’t a fight that our children will fight.  It’s ramping up to befall America in just a few short years. Things will continue to get worse as organizations and institutions fall into disarray, the GOP is there now.
Turning back to God is the only answer.
With that said, this is precisely where America stands at this moment:
The question is, will we continue to slam the door, or will we finally look to see what is on the other side before it’s too late?
Advertisements

What D. Truett Cathy REALLY Said…and the Hatred Who Spun It

Looks like Click-Fil-A is going to continue in the spotlight for a while to come…the left-wing progressive hatred just won’t see it any other way.

image

Most of us have reached a point where we would just like to be left alone to eat the new bacon…our chicken sammiches. But it seems we can not par-take in poultry without being labeled a homophobic hate monger. Why? Well, to be quite honest, it doesn’t fit the MSM narrative.
Let us first take a look at waht Chick-Fil-A Founder D. Truett Cathy actually said regarding marriage:

“supportive of the family —the biblical definition of the family unit.”

Did I miss something? I just can’t seem to find anywhere Mr Cathy said:

“I hate homosexuals.”
“I am opposed to gay marriage.”
“I am opposed to civil unions.”
“I will not hire homosexuals.”
“I will not serve homosexuals.”
“I hope they die if cancer.”
“I hope Roseanne Barr dies of cancer.”
“[Anyone] should all rot in hell.”
“I will make it my mission to give as much money as I can, and only to, any organization that opposes anything LGBT.”

Well, did he? No. The rest of the above was set into motion by progressive spinsters who…wait for it….hate any position that is diametrically opposed to their opinion.
Mr Cathy has the right to value what he sees fit for his family…just as I do…just as you do…without everybody else and their neighbor spinning it into something that it simply is not.
Could you imagine how frustrating that would be if every little think you said was rabidly twisted to fit an agenda that isn’t even on your radar?
I too support marriage and family as defined in the traditional Biblical sense…it is what works for my family. It is what my God has shown me is His desire.
That does not mean that I hate homosexuals, or even dislike them. For all I know, they have a different God, or even not God at all. I don’t shove my beliefs down their throats, and I sure as heck won’t let them shove theirs down mine!
Jesus taught us to love thy neighbor. Let’s do ourselves all a favor…love one another and leave the judgement to our God.
As long as you continue to perpetuate the lies and the hatred, you are guilty of sin…and that is something I certainly don’t want to bear…I have enough judgement of my own to come the day I meet my Maker.

“I Do!” The New Hate Speech?

image
At what point will a man and a woman simply saying “I do” to each other become a crime under “hate speech”? And what role will HR 347 play in this?
Don’t think it can happen? Think again!


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 2,983 other followers

Jen Ennenbach

Follow Me!